Primary sources come first
Rankings start with public datasets, official directories, licensing or certification bodies, and vendor or provider source pages. Editorial interpretation is labeled separately from official data.
Editorial standards
The OT Index publishes rankings only when the source basis, scoring logic, limitations, and reader decision are visible enough to audit.
Publishing standard
Serious rankings need more than a table. Readers should see what the score uses, what it does not use, and what they should verify before making a school, job, relocation, employer, or software decision.
Rankings start with public datasets, official directories, licensing or certification bodies, and vendor or provider source pages. Editorial interpretation is labeled separately from official data.
A rank is useful only if it helps a reader choose a program, setting, city, employer, specialty, or tool. Each ranking states the source basis, weights, caveats, and next questions to ask.
Unavailable source fields, unmatched outcome rows, small cohorts, and profile limitations are called out instead of hidden inside a score.
Rankings are not sold. Any future sponsorship, affiliate relationship, vendor partnership, or paid placement must be labeled and kept separate from editorial scoring.
BLS, NBCOT, ACOTE, CMS, College Scorecard, and vendor pages update on different cycles. Ranking pages show freshness and are refreshed when source systems change materially.
If a source row is wrong, stale, mismatched, or misinterpreted, the ranking should be corrected with the same source discipline used to publish it.
Review process
The same discipline applies across school rankings, salary tables, state and city markets, home health agencies, specialties, and documentation tools.
Independence
The OT Index may eventually publish sponsored tools, employer profiles, or partner resources, but paid relationships cannot determine ranking placement.