Editorial standards

How The OT Index earns reader trust.

The OT Index publishes rankings only when the source basis, scoring logic, data boundaries, and reader decision are clear enough to understand.

SourcesBylinesScoringCorrectionsIndependenceUpdates

Publishing standard

A ranking is not finished until the reader can challenge it.

Serious rankings and news articles need more than a table or headline. Readers should see who published the page, what sources were used, what the evidence can show, and how data gaps affect a school, job, relocation, employer, policy, or software decision.

Primary sources come first

Rankings and news analysis start with public datasets, official directories, licensing or certification bodies, journal articles, payer policies, and vendor or provider source pages. Editorial interpretation is labeled separately from official data.

News pages show publisher signals

News articles show clear dates, newsroom bylines, source links, publisher details, and correction routes so readers can evaluate who published the analysis and what evidence supports it.

Scores must explain the decision

A rank is useful only if it helps a reader choose a program, setting, city, employer, specialty, or tool. Each ranking states the source basis, score factors, follow-up notes, and next questions to ask.

Missing data is disclosed

Unavailable source fields, unmatched outcome rows, small cohorts, and profile limitations are called out instead of hidden inside a score.

Paid influence is separated

Rankings are not sold. Sponsorships, affiliate relationships, vendor partnerships, and paid placements must be labeled and kept separate from editorial scoring.

Updates are tied to source cadence

BLS, NBCOT, ACOTE, CMS, College Scorecard, and vendor pages update on different cycles. Ranking pages show freshness and are refreshed when source systems change materially.

Corrections should improve the record

If a source row is wrong, stale, mismatched, or misinterpreted, the ranking should be corrected with the same source discipline used to publish it.

Review process

What happens before a ranking goes live

The same discipline applies across school rankings, salary tables, state and city markets, home health agencies, specialties, and documentation tools.

  • 1Identify the reader decision and the source systems that can legitimately inform it.
  • 2Separate official fields from The OT Index scoring and editorial context.
  • 3Apply visible weighting rules and explain what the available data can and cannot show before publishing.
  • 4For news articles, show the byline, publication date, updated date, source line, newsroom link, and correction route.
  • 5Link ranking rows to profiles, guides, methodology notes, and primary sources where available.
  • 6Recheck language for reader-facing clarity before publication.

Independence

Rankings are editorial products

Sponsored tools, employer profiles, and partner resources are handled separately from ranking placement. Paid relationships cannot determine where an organization ranks.