School value profile

Augusta University OT value profile

Review why Augusta University ranks #28 in The OT Index public-program value ranking, including institution-level cost, debt, completion, state labor-market context, and matched ACOTE program profiles.

Value rank #2856.7 value score$8,414 in-state tuition$20,500 median debt

Value snapshot

Cost, debt, completion, and career-return context

This profile keeps College Scorecard institution-level measures separate from ACOTE and NBCOT program-specific context so applicants can see what is known and what still needs direct confirmation.

Value score56.7The OT Index composite score for this public-program value ranking.
In-state tuition$8,414College Scorecard institution-wide in-state tuition.
Median debt$20,500Institution-wide median debt, not OT-program-specific debt.
Completion49%Institution-wide completion rate used in the value score.

Our take

Augusta University value assessment

Augusta University is a competitive but not exceptional value option for an in-state applicant. Both tuition and debt beat the comparison midpoint, so the #28 rank is supported by two affordability measures rather than one unusually low number. The 49% completion rate weakens the case.

Why it stands out

  • $8,414 in-state tuition is $2,058 below the public-program midpoint in this comparison. That is a meaningful recurring price advantage.
  • $20,500 median debt is $451 below the midpoint, so lower published tuition appears to translate into lower borrowing at the institution level.

Tradeoffs that matter

  • 49% completion trails the 54% comparison midpoint, so the institution pairs its price with a less reassuring completion record.
  • Georgia's labor-market score is below the program-set midpoint. Lower local opportunity reduces the value of choosing the school mainly for geographic convenience.
  • The headline price is in-state tuition. An applicant who does not qualify for resident pricing should not expect the #28 value case to carry over unchanged.

What to compare next

  • Compare Augusta University with the two nearest-ranked public options on tuition and debt separately; similar value scores can be driven by different affordability strengths.
  • Compare the matched OT master's program profile on degree and delivery format before treating the institution-level price advantage as a program-level win.
  • Put Georgia's labor-market score beside the state where you expect to work after graduation; local value is less relevant when the likely first job is elsewhere.

Applicant read

What makes this school look affordable—or not

The value score is strongest when low cost, manageable debt, institution-wide completion strength, and local labor-market opportunity point in the same direction.

Published tuition

The published in-state tuition is unusually low for an OT pathway, which is why this institution ranks highly for value.

Median debt

The institution-wide median debt is moderate, so tuition—not unusually low borrowing—is doing most of the work in the value score.

Completion rate

The institution-wide completion rate is low enough to undercut the value case: a low price matters less when completion is less dependable.

State opportunity

Georgia ranks lower for OT pay and employment in this model, so this program's value depends more heavily on low cost and the applicant's intended setting.

Program profiles

Linked ACOTE program profiles

Open the program-level profiles before treating the institution-level value score as an application decision.

Program profileValue contextNext step
Augusta University OT master's profileOT master's program; ACOTE next on-site review 2030/2031.Open profile

Compare value options

Other public OT value profiles

Compare the value score against other public options before narrowing your application list.