School value profile
University of Alabama at Birmingham OT value profile
Review why University of Alabama at Birmingham ranks #42 in The OT Index public-program value ranking, including institution-level cost, debt, completion, state labor-market context, and matched ACOTE program profiles.
Value rank #4254.4 value score$9,098 in-state tuition$22,300 median debt
Value snapshot
Cost, debt, completion, and career-return context
This profile keeps College Scorecard institution-level measures separate from ACOTE and NBCOT program-specific context so applicants can see what is known and what still needs direct confirmation.
Our take
University of Alabama at Birmingham value assessment
Why it stands out
- $9,098 in-state tuition is $1,374 below the public-program midpoint in this comparison. That is a meaningful recurring price advantage.
- 64% completion is above the comparison midpoint, which matters because affordability is more compelling when students are also completing at a strong rate.
Tradeoffs that matter
- Median debt is $1,349 above the midpoint. That borrowing result directly weakens the return-on-cost case.
- Alabama's labor-market score is below the program-set midpoint. Lower local opportunity reduces the value of choosing the school mainly for geographic convenience.
- A #42 rank places the institution in the lower half of the public-value comparison; stronger-priced alternatives are readily available in the same dataset.
What to compare next
- Compare University of Alabama at Birmingham with the two nearest-ranked public options on tuition and debt separately; similar value scores can be driven by different affordability strengths.
- Compare the matched OT doctorate program profile on degree and delivery format before treating the institution-level price advantage as a program-level win.
- Put Alabama's labor-market score beside the state where you expect to work after graduation; local value is less relevant when the likely first job is elsewhere.
Applicant read
What makes this school look affordable—or not
The value score is strongest when low cost, manageable debt, institution-wide completion strength, and local labor-market opportunity point in the same direction.
Published tuition
The published in-state tuition is unusually low for an OT pathway, which is why this institution ranks highly for value.
Median debt
The institution-wide median debt is high enough to weaken the affordability case even if the published tuition looks competitive.
Completion rate
The institution-wide completion rate is low enough to undercut the value case: a low price matters less when completion is less dependable.
State opportunity
Alabama ranks lower for OT pay and employment in this model, so this program's value depends more heavily on low cost and the applicant's intended setting.
Program profiles
Linked ACOTE program profiles
Open the program-level profiles before treating the institution-level value score as an application decision.
| Program profile | Value context | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| University of Alabama at Birmingham OT doctorate profile | OT doctorate program; ACOTE next on-site review 2029/2030. | Open profile |
Compare value options
Other public OT value profiles
Compare the value score against other public options before narrowing your application list.
Rank #69
University of South Alabama
$10,116 in-state tuition; $24,929 median debt; 47.0 value score.
Open value profile Rank #41University of Cincinnati
$13,976 in-state tuition; $21,250 median debt; 54.6 value score.
Open value profile Rank #43University of Louisiana at Monroe
$9,190 in-state tuition; $21,500 median debt; 54.4 value score.
Open value profile
University of Alabama at Birmingham is a weaker value proposition than most public institutions in this comparison for an in-state applicant. The value case is tuition-led; debt does not provide the same advantage. The 64% completion rate supports the case.