School value profile

University of New Hampshire OT value profile

Review why University of New Hampshire ranks #77 in The OT Index public-program value ranking, including institution-level cost, debt, completion, state labor-market context, and matched ACOTE program profiles.

Value rank #7738.3 value score$19,202 in-state tuition$26,814 median debt

Value snapshot

Cost, debt, completion, and career-return context

This profile keeps College Scorecard institution-level measures separate from ACOTE and NBCOT program-specific context so applicants can see what is known and what still needs direct confirmation.

Value score38.3The OT Index composite score for this public-program value ranking.
In-state tuition$19,202College Scorecard institution-wide in-state tuition.
Median debt$26,814Institution-wide median debt, not OT-program-specific debt.
Completion76%Institution-wide completion rate used in the value score.

Our take

University of New Hampshire value assessment

University of New Hampshire is a weaker value proposition than most public institutions in this comparison for an in-state applicant. Neither tuition nor debt beats the comparison midpoint, which explains the weaker placement. The 76% completion rate supports the case.

Why it stands out

  • 76% completion is above the comparison midpoint, which matters because affordability is more compelling when students are also completing at a strong rate.
  • New Hampshire's labor-market score is above the program-set midpoint, giving graduates a stronger local employment backdrop than price alone would suggest.

Tradeoffs that matter

  • Published in-state tuition is $8,730 above the comparison midpoint, so this is not one of the genuinely low-price public options.
  • Median debt is $5,863 above the midpoint. That borrowing result directly weakens the return-on-cost case.
  • A #77 rank places the institution in the lower half of the public-value comparison; stronger-priced alternatives are readily available in the same dataset.

What to compare next

  • Compare University of New Hampshire with the two nearest-ranked public options on tuition and debt separately; similar value scores can be driven by different affordability strengths.
  • Compare the matched OT doctorate and OT master's programs profile on degree and delivery format before treating the institution-level price advantage as a program-level win.
  • Put New Hampshire's labor-market score beside the state where you expect to work after graduation; local value is less relevant when the likely first job is elsewhere.

Applicant read

What makes this school look affordable—or not

The value score is strongest when low cost, manageable debt, institution-wide completion strength, and local labor-market opportunity point in the same direction.

Published tuition

The published in-state tuition is higher than the lowest-cost public options in this ranking, so scholarships and a realistic borrowing plan matter more.

Median debt

The institution-wide median debt is high enough to weaken the affordability case even if the published tuition looks competitive.

Completion rate

The institution-wide completion rate is respectable but not exceptional, so it provides only modest support for the value case.

State opportunity

New Hampshire has a middle-of-the-pack job market in this model. Compare the strongest metros and common first jobs instead of relying on the statewide average.

Program profiles

Linked ACOTE program profiles

Open the program-level profiles before treating the institution-level value score as an application decision.

Program profileValue contextNext step
University of New Hampshire OT doctorate profileOT doctorate and OT master's programs; ACOTE next on-site review 2031/2032.Open profile
University of New Hampshire OT master's profileOT doctorate and OT master's programs; ACOTE next on-site review 2031/2032.Open profile

Compare value options

Other public OT value profiles

Compare the value score against other public options before narrowing your application list.