School value profile
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley OT value profile
Review why University of Texas Rio Grande Valley ranks #7 in The OT Index public-program value ranking, including institution-level cost, debt, completion, state labor-market context, and matched ACOTE program profiles.
Value rank #765.8 value score$9,987 in-state tuition$12,950 median debt
Value snapshot
Cost, debt, completion, and career-return context
This profile keeps College Scorecard institution-level measures separate from ACOTE and NBCOT program-specific context so applicants can see what is known and what still needs direct confirmation.
Our take
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley value assessment
Why it stands out
- $9,987 in-state tuition is $485 below the public-program midpoint in this comparison. That is a meaningful recurring price advantage.
- $12,950 median debt is $8,001 below the midpoint, so lower published tuition appears to translate into lower borrowing at the institution level.
- Texas's labor-market score is above the program-set midpoint, giving graduates a stronger local employment backdrop than price alone would suggest.
Tradeoffs that matter
- 51% completion trails the 54% comparison midpoint, so the institution pairs its price with a less reassuring completion record.
- The headline price is in-state tuition. An applicant who does not qualify for resident pricing should not expect the #7 value case to carry over unchanged.
- The matched pathway includes an entry-level doctorate. Even at a high-value public institution, that route asks for more time in school than a master's pathway to the same OT credential.
What to compare next
- Compare University of Texas Rio Grande Valley with the two nearest-ranked public options on tuition and debt separately; similar value scores can be driven by different affordability strengths.
- Compare the matched OT doctorate program profile on degree and delivery format before treating the institution-level price advantage as a program-level win.
- Put Texas's labor-market score beside the state where you expect to work after graduation; local value is less relevant when the likely first job is elsewhere.
Applicant read
What makes this school look affordable—or not
The value score is strongest when low cost, manageable debt, institution-wide completion strength, and local labor-market opportunity point in the same direction.
Published tuition
The published in-state tuition is unusually low for an OT pathway, which is why this institution ranks highly for value.
Median debt
The institution-wide median debt is low enough to reinforce the affordability case rather than contradict it.
Completion rate
The institution-wide completion rate is low enough to undercut the value case: a low price matters less when completion is less dependable.
State opportunity
Texas has a middle-of-the-pack job market in this model. Compare the strongest metros and common first jobs instead of relying on the statewide average.
Program profiles
Linked ACOTE program profiles
Open the program-level profiles before treating the institution-level value score as an application decision.
| Program profile | Value context | Next step |
|---|---|---|
| University of Texas Rio Grande Valley OT doctorate profile | OT doctorate program; ACOTE next on-site review 2030/2031. | Open profile |
Compare value options
Other public OT value profiles
Compare the value score against other public options before narrowing your application list.
Rank #11
University of Texas at Tyler
$9,736 in-state tuition; $17,137 median debt; 63.6 value score.
Open value profile Rank #13Texas Woman's University
$8,640 in-state tuition; $19,218 median debt; 62.8 value score.
Open value profile Rank #14The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center
$9,011 in-state tuition; $20,500 median debt; 61.9 value score.
Open value profile
University of Texas Rio Grande Valley is a genuinely strong public-value lead for an in-state applicant. Both tuition and debt beat the comparison midpoint, so the #7 rank is supported by two affordability measures rather than one unusually low number. The 51% completion rate weakens the case.